0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1920 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 240 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 03:04:34 EDT 2025 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GlKl3P5H0m/E---3.1_6951.p 43.45/5.97 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 43.45/5.97 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 43.45/5.97 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 43.45/5.97 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # ehoh_best3_rw with pid 7040 completed with status 0 43.45/5.97 # Result found by ehoh_best3_rw 43.45/5.97 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 43.45/5.97 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 43.45/5.97 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 43.45/5.97 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHHFFSBN 43.45/5.97 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 43.45/5.97 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 72s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # new_ho_10_unif with pid 7046 completed with status 0 43.45/5.97 # Result found by new_ho_10_unif 43.45/5.97 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 43.45/5.97 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 43.45/5.97 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 240s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 43.45/5.97 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHHFFSBN 43.45/5.97 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 43.45/5.97 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 72s (1) cores 43.45/5.97 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 43.45/5.97 # Presaturation interreduction done 43.45/5.97 43.45/5.97 # Proof found! 43.45/5.97 # SZS status Theorem 43.45/5.97 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 43.45/5.97 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 43.45/5.97 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: a > a > $o). 43.45/5.97 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_0: (a > $o) > a). 43.45/5.97 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_2: (a > $o) > a > a). 43.45/5.97 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_0: a > a). 43.45/5.97 thf(cTHM145_C_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:(((![X3:a > $o]:((![X4:a]:((![X5:a]:((((X3 @ X5)&(X3 @ X5))=>(X1 @ X5 @ X4)))=>((X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4)&(X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4))))&![X6:a]:(((X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))<=(X3 @ X6)))))&![X7:a, X8:a, X6:a]:((((X1 @ X7 @ X8)&(X1 @ X8 @ X6))=>(X1 @ X7 @ X6))))=>![X9:a > a]:((![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ X7 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))))=>?[X10:a]:(((X1 @ X10 @ (X9 @ X10))&(X1 @ (X9 @ X10) @ X10))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GlKl3P5H0m/E---3.1_6951.p', cTHM145_C_pme)). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:(((![X3:a > $o]:((![X4:a]:((![X5:a]:(((X3 @ X5)=>(X1 @ X5 @ X4)))=>(X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4)))&![X6:a]:(((X3 @ X6)=>(X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))))))&![X7:a, X8:a, X6:a]:((((X1 @ X7 @ X8)&(X1 @ X8 @ X6))=>(X1 @ X7 @ X6))))=>![X9:a > a]:((![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ X7 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))))=>?[X10:a]:(((X1 @ X10 @ (X9 @ X10))&(X1 @ (X9 @ X10) @ X10)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM145_C_pme])])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X26:a > $o, X27:a, X29:a, X30:a, X31:a, X32:a, X34:a, X35:a, X36:a]:(((((((X26 @ (esk2_2 @ X26 @ X27))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X26) @ X27))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X26 @ X27) @ X27)|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X26) @ X27)))&(~(X26 @ X29)|(epred1_0 @ X29 @ (esk1_0 @ X26))))&(~(epred1_0 @ X30 @ X31)|~(epred1_0 @ X31 @ X32)|(epred1_0 @ X30 @ X32)))&((~(epred1_0 @ X34 @ X35)|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X34) @ (esk3_0 @ X35)))&(~(epred1_0 @ X36 @ (esk3_0 @ X36))|~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X36) @ X36))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X5:a, X6:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X6)|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X5 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X6:a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X6)))|~((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X4:a]:(((X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3) @ X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ X3))|~((X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X20:a > a, X9:a > a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X20 @ Z0))))) @ X4)) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X20 @ Z0)))))) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ (X20 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X20 @ Z0))))) @ X4)) @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a > a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0))) @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0)))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))) @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X9:a > a, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ (X9 @ Z0)))))))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (X9 @ (esk3_0 @ X4)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_4])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))) @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:((~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X4)))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 43.45/5.97 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']). 43.45/5.97 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 43.45/5.97 # Parsed axioms : 2 43.45/5.97 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1 43.45/5.97 # Initial clauses : 6 43.45/5.97 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 43.45/5.97 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6 43.45/5.97 # Processed clauses : 865 43.45/5.97 # ...of these trivial : 128 43.45/5.97 # ...subsumed : 272 43.45/5.97 # ...remaining for further processing : 465 43.45/5.97 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 43.45/5.97 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 43.45/5.97 # Backward-subsumed : 29 43.45/5.97 # Backward-rewritten : 47 43.45/5.97 # Generated clauses : 48582 43.45/5.97 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41702 43.45/5.97 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 43.45/5.97 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 43.45/5.97 # Paramodulations : 48398 43.45/5.97 # Factorizations : 183 43.45/5.97 # NegExts : 0 43.45/5.97 # Equation resolutions : 1 43.45/5.97 # Disequality decompositions : 0 43.45/5.97 # Total rewrite steps : 7285 43.45/5.97 # ...of those cached : 6320 43.45/5.97 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 43.45/5.97 # Propositional check models : 0 43.45/5.97 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 43.45/5.97 # Propositional clauses : 0 43.45/5.97 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 43.45/5.97 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 43.45/5.97 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 43.45/5.97 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 43.45/5.97 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 43.45/5.97 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 43.45/5.97 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 43.45/5.97 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 43.45/5.97 # Current number of processed clauses : 383 43.45/5.97 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 92 43.45/5.97 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 43.45/5.97 # Negative unit clauses : 15 43.45/5.97 # Non-unit-clauses : 276 43.45/5.97 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40344 43.45/5.97 # ...number of literals in the above : 125906 43.45/5.97 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 43.45/5.97 # Current number of archived clauses : 82 43.45/5.97 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11964 43.45/5.97 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10030 43.45/5.97 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 293 43.45/5.97 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2672 43.45/5.97 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 43.45/5.97 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2202 43.45/5.97 # BW rewrite match successes : 57 43.45/5.97 # Condensation attempts : 865 43.45/5.97 # Condensation successes : 9 43.45/5.97 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12462575 43.45/5.97 # Search garbage collected termcells : 387 43.45/5.97 43.45/5.97 # ------------------------------------------------- 43.45/5.97 # User time : 5.184 s 43.45/5.97 # System time : 0.198 s 43.45/5.97 # Total time : 5.382 s 43.45/5.97 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages 43.45/5.97 43.45/5.97 # ------------------------------------------------- 43.45/5.97 # User time : 5.185 s 43.45/5.97 # System time : 0.200 s 43.45/5.97 # Total time : 5.386 s 43.45/5.97 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages 43.45/5.97 % E exiting 43.45/5.97 % E exiting 43.45/5.97 EOF